Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with count
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 2920
Vim's "count" feature allows you to multiply or iterate a command by passing it an optional number. Questions about counting things should use the "counting" tag instead.
25
votes
5
answers
8k
views
Can I repeat a macro with the "dot operator"?
Can I repeat a macro with the . command? For example, I'd like to be able to type:
@q...
and have it effectively call @q 4 times. With the default behavior, this works only if 'q' holds a single co …
- 17.9k
2
votes
1
answer
628
views
Can I make all "resize split" commands take a default count?
While reading through this answer, I found these useful commands:
Ctrl+W +/-: increase/decrease height
Ctrl+W >/<: increase/decrease width
These are super useful, but I hate how it defaults to res …
- 17.9k
5
votes
2
answers
115
views
Can I make the indent commands take an additional count that doesn't affect the motion?
In my mind, this is a total waste, because if the count before the operator was "indent level", and the count after is for a repeated motion, this doesn't lose any ability. … If I wanted to indent the next four lines one time, I could just do
>4>
or even
>3j
If the first count were to work this way, you could even do a command like this:
2>4>
And this would mean " …
- 17.9k
9
votes
2
answers
822
views
How to allow count *before* my custom operator?
I've reproduced this bug in Vim 8.0 on Windows and Ubuntu and in Neovim 0.2.1 on Windows)
So how can I define my operator so that a count works the same before or after the operator? … I realize that this is a very minor difference, and that for most intents and purposes, I can simply get around it by always doing the count afterwards. …
- 17.9k