4

E.g. I am trying to change foldmethod to syntax:

:set foldmethod=s^I^I

When I press tab after typing s, I get ^I instead of auto-completing to syntax. Only possible options are manual,indent,expr,marker,syntax,diff. So it should be possible to get auto-completion.

1
  • 5
    This isn't implemented unfortunately, so you can't do this; not without sending a patch to Vim anyway. I think I should still have a patch to add completion for many of the options with a static list of values, but I haven't really gotten around to finishing it. Sep 20, 2022 at 21:19

1 Answer 1

2

This was recently implemented. Just update to Vim 9.0.1958 and it will just work.

Relevant commit:

patch 9.0.1958: cannot complete option values
Problem:  cannot complete option values
Solution: Add completion functions for several options

Add cmdline tab-completion for setting string options

Add tab-completion for setting string options on the cmdline using
`:set=` (along with `:set+=` and `:set-=`).

The existing tab completion for setting options currently only works
when nothing is typed yet, and it only fills in with the existing value,
e.g. when the user does `:set diffopt=<Tab>` it will be completed to
`set diffopt=internal,filler,closeoff` and nothing else. This isn't too
useful as a user usually wants auto-complete to suggest all the possible
values, such as 'iblank', or 'algorithm:patience'.

For set= and set+=, this adds a new optional callback function for each
option that can be invoked when doing completion. This allows for each
option to have control over how completion works. For example, in
'diffopt', it will suggest the default enumeration, but if `algorithm:`
is selected, it will further suggest different algorithm types like
'meyers' and 'patience'. When using set=, the existing option value will
be filled in as the first choice to preserve the existing behavior. When
using set+= this won't happen as it doesn't make sense.

For flag list options (e.g. 'mouse' and 'guioptions'), completion will
take into account existing typed values (and in the case of set+=, the
existing option value) to make sure it doesn't suggest duplicates.

For set-=, there is a new `ExpandSettingSubtract` function which will
handle flag list and comma-separated options smartly, by only suggesting
values that currently exist in the option.

Note that Vim has some existing code that adds special handling for
'filetype', 'syntax', and misc dir options like 'backupdir'. This change
preserves them as they already work, instead of converting to the new
callback API for each option.
2

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.