I recall (perhaps in the early 2000's) having
set nocompatible as the first line of my vimrc and most Vim guides and tutorials recommending that practice.
Some examples I could easily find online:
vimrcfile of Alex Quinn starts with:
set nocompatible " Use VIM settings rather than Vi settings; this *must* be
" first in .vimrc
- How I boosted my Vim blog article:
Before doing anything else, make sure you have the following line in your .vimrc file:" This must be first, because it changes other options as side effect set nocompatible
However, that advice doesn't seem to make much sense these days, since
nocompatible is automatically used whenever a user .vimrc file is found, so there doesn't seem to be any compelling reason to use
set nocompatible in your user .vimrc file.
When was this practice necessary? Was the default to nocompatible when user vimrc is found changed in a specific version of Vim, such that setting
nocompatible was necessary in previous versions of Vim? Is there any advantages or side-effects of an explicit
set nocompatible that I'm perhaps missing?
While researching this subject, I found:
- References to this being necessary if you wanted to use that as a system vimrc. But that doesn't seem to be the case in most places, since the links above clearly talk about the user .vimrc file.
- Mentions of a specific Linux distribution (Debian) explicitly including a
set compatiblein the system vimrc file, which would require an explicit
set nocompatibleto counter the distro defaults. (Not sure if that makes sense.)
Is there some truth or merits to these points above? Or was
set nocompatible in large part cargo culting?