I often find myself typing commands like gg"+yG or ggdG and would like a more efficient way to do this without having to move the cursor twice. Is there any command that I can use e.g. y[movement] to copy the entire buffer without moving the cursor?


Since vim uses the percent sign to reference the current buffer, you can use it to get everything quickly.

:%y will yank the entire buffer :%y+ will yank it to the + register (and presumably the clipboard, provided vim was compiled with the proper options).

:%d and :%d+ will do the same for deletion.

In each of these cases, the cursor remains in place.

  • Wow, all this time I was using mmgg"+yG`m and never thought of this. Thanks, this is going right in the .vimrc. – Doorknob Mar 3 '15 at 14:01
  • @Doorknob instead of setting and using marks you could just use C-o twice to go back. – Ruslan Jan 3 '18 at 16:48

Another solution is to use a plugin called vim-textobj-entire. By default, this plugin provides the text object ae for the entire buffer, ie for the entire buffer except leading and trailing empty lines.

This plugin depends on vim-textobj-user by the same author, which lets users define any text objects comfortably. There are many plugins that make good use of this.


There is no text object for the whole file by default, but it is possible to create them using omap. In this case, it would look something like this:

onoremap f :<c-u>normal! mzggVG<cr>`z

Here is a breakdown of how it works:

onoremap f " make 'f' the text object name
:<c-u> " use <c-u> to prevent vim from inserting visual selection marker at the beginning of the command automatically.
normal! " use normal to make key presses ignoring any user mappings
mzggVG<cr>`z " make a marker in register z, select the entire file in visual line mode and enter the normal command, and go back to the z marker


Ctrlu can be used in the command line mode to delete everything to the left of the cursor position. The reason why this is done is because if you enter the command line straight from visual mode, it will automatically insert '<,'> on the command line, and that isn't what we want. I would also suggest you use something other than f, because f is normally used to move to the next searched character on the line. For example, fi will go to the next i on the current line.

Relevant help topics:

:help omap-info
:help :normal
:help c_CTRL-U
:help v_:
  • Is there a way to do this while leaving the cursor alone? – Random832 Mar 2 '15 at 20:17
  • @Random832 Adding a `` to the end will return the cursor to the previous location. – SnoringFrog Mar 2 '15 at 20:22
  • I'm concerned that this will make it not apply the selection to the yank command. I'll experiment some today. – Random832 Mar 2 '15 at 20:24
  • 1
    I added a marker command to the mapping, it should leave the cursor where it is now. – EvergreenTree Mar 2 '15 at 20:42

Here are some quick n' dirty mappings to accomplish the task:

nnoremap yY :%yank <c-r>=v:register<cr><cr>
nnoremap dD :%delete <c-r>=v:register<cr><cr>

Now you can use yY and dD to yank/delete respectively. It's not as nice as using a full blown text object, but sometimes the simplest solutions are best.

For more help see:

:h :y
:h :d
:h [range]
:h v:register
:h c_ctrl-r
:h @=

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.