Timeline for Who manages the vim-scripts project on Github, and how is it used?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 24, 2017 at 19:29 | history | edited | Martin Tournoij | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 3 characters in body; edited tags
|
May 24, 2017 at 19:29 | answer | added | Martin Tournoij | timeline score: 2 | |
Oct 4, 2016 at 17:14 | comment | added | BPS |
@romainl @Carpetsmoker I noticed that Vundle appears to support both the github vim-scripts repo and vim-scripts.org. From the docs: "Vundle integrates very well with both GitHub and vim-scripts.org (vim-scripts.org/vim/scripts.html) allowing short URIs." For plugin managers such as Vundle that support both, is there any advantage to continuing support for the github vim-scripts site?
|
|
Oct 4, 2016 at 15:33 | comment | added | BPS | @romainl The following from Vundle's documentation is what makes me think it may still be used: Vim Scripts ----------- Any single word without a slash '/' is assumed to be from Vim Scripts. > Plugin 'ctrlp.vim' => github.com/vim-scripts/ctrlp.vim | |
Oct 4, 2016 at 15:33 | comment | added | Martin Tournoij | @romainl The problem is that some plugin managers refuse to support anything other than git (cough vim-plug cough), so it's useful if you're not using git for an automatic mirror (I tried hg-git but that doesn't seem to work very well). | |
Oct 4, 2016 at 15:31 | comment | added | Martin Tournoij | I sent an email to the maintainer last February, who mentioned "gmarik has been running it... I'll ping him. If he's not interested, I should probably take it down." and then in a later email "gmarik just emailed that he'd look at it. It'll probably be back up tomorrow." ... Well, guess not :-) Apparently this is the reason it doesn't work: github.com/vim-scraper/vim-scraper/issues/78 | |
Oct 4, 2016 at 15:25 | comment | added | romainl | I don't think that a) the project is maintained anymore, b) any plugin manager uses it. | |
Oct 4, 2016 at 14:46 | history | asked | BPS | CC BY-SA 3.0 |