Skip to main content
added 153 characters in body
Source Link
Mike Holt
  • 278
  • 2
  • 6

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

(Note that buffer 1 is not missing. It's a hidden empty buffer named [No Name] that was created by the first call to gvim with no file arguments)

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

Update:

It looks like whatever gvim is doing here has to do with the fact that it recognizes the extensions .cpp and .h as special in some way. If I replace .cpp with .cat and .h with .dog, the files are loaded in the same order specified on the command line, as expected.

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

Update:

It looks like whatever gvim is doing here has to do with the fact that it recognizes the extensions .cpp and .h as special in some way. If I replace .cpp with .cat and .h with .dog, the files are loaded in the same order specified on the command line, as expected.

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

(Note that buffer 1 is not missing. It's a hidden empty buffer named [No Name] that was created by the first call to gvim with no file arguments)

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

Update:

It looks like whatever gvim is doing here has to do with the fact that it recognizes the extensions .cpp and .h as special in some way. If I replace .cpp with .cat and .h with .dog, the files are loaded in the same order specified on the command line, as expected.

added 299 characters in body
Source Link
Mike Holt
  • 278
  • 2
  • 6

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

Update:

It looks like whatever gvim is doing here has to do with the fact that it recognizes the extensions .cpp and .h as special in some way. If I replace .cpp with .cat and .h with .dog, the files are loaded in the same order specified on the command line, as expected.

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

Update:

It looks like whatever gvim is doing here has to do with the fact that it recognizes the extensions .cpp and .h as special in some way. If I replace .cpp with .cat and .h with .dog, the files are loaded in the same order specified on the command line, as expected.

edited body
Source Link
Mike Holt
  • 278
  • 2
  • 6

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks maybe like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks maybe like the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

When I open multiple files in gvim with no options, they are assigned to buffers in the order I specify on the command line:

gvim foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Doing :ls then yields:

1 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
2      "foo.h"                    line 0
3      "bar.cpp"                  line 0
4      "bar.h"                    line 0

However, when I am using --servername and --remote to have only one instance of gvim, the files are loaded in a different order:

gvim --servername gvim 

// Later ...

gvim --servername gvim --remote foo.cpp foo.h bar.cpp bar.h

Then :ls yields:

2 %a   "foo.cpp"                  line 1
3      "bar.cpp                   line 0
4      "foo.h"                    line 0
5      "bar.h"                    line 0

It looks like maybe the --remote option causes the files to be grouped by extension. Is there a way to make --remote load the files into buffers in the same order specified on the command line?

BTW, this is with stock gvim 7.4, on CentOS 6.9, with no .vimrc or .gvimrc, and no plugins installed.

added 8 characters in body
Source Link
Mike Holt
  • 278
  • 2
  • 6
Loading
Source Link
Mike Holt
  • 278
  • 2
  • 6
Loading