Timeline for Colorscheme's background not correct in terminal
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 31, 2019 at 6:24 | comment | added | Johnny Wong |
Yes, it is export TERM=xterm-256color . Value xterm-256color for 256-bit color, xterm for 8-bit. When vim see the former value, it should set t_Co=256 . If leaving TERM=xterm and in vim doing :set t_Co=256 will still give poor color.
|
|
May 30, 2018 at 19:10 | comment | added | Shyam Habarakada |
I had this exact issue and export TERM=xterm+256colors helped vim solarized detect and use the exact background color as what my terminal has.
|
|
Apr 23, 2018 at 16:15 | comment | added | Xeoncross |
export TERM=xterm+256color on OSX I get zle-line-finish:echoti:1: no such terminfo capability: rmkx
|
|
Dec 21, 2017 at 0:47 | comment | added | Edward |
It should be export TERM=xterm+256color , NOT "colors" (plural). Also, I believe that is should be xterm-256color , NOT "**+**256color; but I may be wrong specifically about using it with solarized. According to this answer, # Entries with embedded plus signs are designed to be included through use/tc capabilities, not used as standalone entries.
|
|
Feb 20, 2015 at 5:01 | comment | added | Oberdiear | I installed ncurses-term. I then ran the command. After I run it, all text becomes grey and the background is black. | |
Feb 20, 2015 at 4:42 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
More specific instructions for xterm+256color in Ubuntu
|
Feb 20, 2015 at 3:54 | comment | added | Oberdiear |
The desert256 works fine, but I am not a huge fan. I do believe the TERM variable is incorrect, but I have no idea how to change it.
|
|
Feb 20, 2015 at 0:31 | history | edited | muru | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
list formatting
|
Feb 20, 2015 at 0:24 | review | First posts | |||
Feb 20, 2015 at 1:26 | |||||
Feb 20, 2015 at 0:23 | history | answered | El Developer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |